From the editor
Welcome GuestLog in  Register
Online: 0 members and 325 guests.
Keyword 

Tuesday, October 27, 2009 - 1:12 am

The Nampa Classical Academy plans to choose new board members tonight. According to the charter school's bylaws, the founding members will choose new members for the board of directors. The charter may have five to seven voting members. Two voting board members resigned earlier this month because they have concerns with two of the founding members: twin brothers Isaac and Mike Moffett.

Other board members have also resigned since the charter was founded, but their reasons have not been disclosed

According to the charter's own bylaws, The founders will choose the new board of directors.

The founding members, as outlined in the charter, are Matthew Schneiderman, Shawna Schneiderman, Michael Moffett, Isaac Moffett and Tracy Young (now married to Isaac Moffett).

Isaac Moffett is listed on the academy's Web site as a nonvoting ad hoc board member, director of operations and a geography teacher. Shawna Schneiderman is listed as a logic, literature and rhetoric teacher. Matthew Schneiderman is her husband.

Now here's where it gets dicey. Shawna and Isaac are paid charter employees. They are both married to two other founders. As I understand it, the head master or the top education official, supervises the certified staff, but the board of directors have the ultimate authority.

I can't tell if this is the structure that all charters operate under. I hope it's not. Everything is too connected.

Mike Moffett doesn't work for the charter but he was the first charter board chairman and he stepped up as the acting chairman when the latest board members resigned.

There are at least two other voting board members - Mitch Miller and Melia Loftus, who said last week at a meeting that they could not support the Moffett brothers in their leadership roles.

Once the founders choose new board members - I'm betting the newly selected board members will side with the Moffetts. I also expect to see a petition from the parents and teachers to remove Miller and Loftus from the board.

So far, it looks like the Charter Commission has serious concerns with Nampa Classical Academy. For starters, the Charter Commission says NCA did not meet the deadline — faxing at the last minute isn't wise — but even more importantly, the charter apparently didn't answer all the questions.

Furthermore, the Charter Commission has even more questions, based on the responses it received.

Remember, the Charter Commission and Nampa Classical Academy are already at odds because the Charter Commission has said NCA can't use religious textbooks. NCA has filed a lawsuit.

Back to my point. Where's the accountability if everyone is related or connected? When is it a conflict or a perceived conflict?

How do you separate personal lives and relationships from accountability and absolute transparency? And what about personal motives?

According to the bylaws, the Charter Commission can appoint a nonvoting member to the Nampa Classical Academy.

That needs to be done right away. It won't stop the board from taking steps, but it might provide a public conscience.

Idaho taxpayers need more accountability when it comes to charters.

In the meantime, I hope this all sheds new light on the need to create better methods for accountability from the get go. And it has to start with limiting the relationships and the power that certain people hold. It seems too easy to create your own kingdom with taxpayers' money.

And I would be remiss if I didn't say this: There were critics/local watchdogs who raised some of these same kinds of concerns when Nampa's Liberty Charter and Victory Charter schools were founded. I'm not saying things were exactly the same, but there were concerns. But I'm not rehashing all of that right now.

Idaho Code: Public Charter Schools

(3) "Founder" means a person, including employees or staff of a public charter school, who makes a material contribution toward the establishment of a public charter school in accordance with criteria determined by the board of directors of the public charter school, and who is designated as such at the time the board of directors acknowledges and accepts such contribution. The criteria for determining when a person is a founder shall not discriminate against any person on any basis prohibited by the federal or state constitutions or any federal, state or local law. The designation of a person as a founder, and the admission preferences available to the children of a founder, shall not constitute pecuniary benefits.

Criteria for revoking a charter.

Bookmark and Share

Comments:

Wow. So, because I have a legitimate concern for a relative that is attending that school and as a taxpayer am questioning the use of public funding to support unwise and unconstitutional business practices, I should just go away? And the tenor of your post---I certainly hope that you are not involved with the children at the NCA, it appears that you have anger issues as well as an inability to frame a rational argument. I thought the NCA was heavily invested in rhetoric and logic? Attempting to shout someone down for their view simply because you do not like the scrutiny of the NCA is nothing short of childish behavior. YOu also misread my post, I said nothing about not liking the Nampa PD and have the utmost respect for them. I also have great respect for our certified public and private educators in Nampa. They exemplify what education should be for our kids, not a power struggle and selfserving lawsuit intended only to boost the egos of the MOffets. Hopefully the board and the Charter commission will do what is best for the children at the school and ignore the shouting from the few loyal soldiers of the Moffett family. Until then, I will continue to voice my opinion, thank you very much. And, I will respect your right to do the same.
BlueinIdaho - 10:25 AM, Friday October 30, 2009
In case you did not notice Blue in Idaho you are the ONLY one still belaboring the point! We get it, you don't like the Nampa Classical Academy - find another issue. Sure must stink Blue in a RED state! And by the way you can work on the Nampa PD if you don't like them - there IS a process, it's called vote out the mayor and put someone in who you think is better, perhaps yourself. And by the way the Charter School Commission CHOOSE NOT to put a member on the Board intitally. Get a life and focus on more important items like ensuring we are not forced to deal with mandatory health care fromthe government.
Charter Supporter - 10:18 PM, Thursday October 29, 2009
I agree, it's a complete racket. I never imagined that you could create a taxpayer-funded business to benefit yourself and your family members all by submitting a plan to the state. Without any experience in the operation that you are creating or the proper credentials... To top it off, it's not as if this taxpayer-funded business is responding to a community need, there are plenty of schools in Nampa, both public and private that lost enrollment to this school. And, it's not as if this taxpayer-funded business is nonconsequential--its purpose is to educate our children. Next time you get a chance, walk into Otter's office and plunk down a thesis of how you envision a "better" police department for Nampa and that you want not only taxpayer funds to create this new police department, but you also are naming yourself, your brother, your best friend and your wife as the department heads who will also benefit from a salary. I wonder how long he'll grin at you before he has your butt thrown out on the street. Why is it any different for education??? The commission should put a nonvoting member on the board to at least provide some oversight to this little kingdom.
BlueinIdaho - 10:44 AM, Tuesday October 27, 2009


If you Log in or Register you will not be required to fill this out each time you comment.
Name:
Email Address: Will not be published.
Comment [max. 5000 chars.] Character Count:

Managing Editor Vickie Holbrook comments on newspaper issues, explains our decision-making processes or passes on insight, background or insider information that doesn't make it into print.
Even more importantly, it gives you, our readers and Web visitors, a chance to ask questions and offer feedback in an open forum.
Vickie has worked at the Idaho Press-Tribune for 30 years, starting as a reporter. She was named editor in 1996.

    follow me on Twitter
    IPT Community Calendar
    << >>
    SMTWTFS
    01020304050607
    08091011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930          
    Submit your event - FREE!
    Blog Admin login
    Username:
    Password: